I’ve started in reading the archives, taking them from the bottom–and I find some interesting questions raised.
I’m offered a chance to comment, but the moment seems to have passed for carrying on the original conversation. I get the impression that new comments would simply gather dust.
So–In that situation I should simply add a new post reviving the subject? I suppose this is more natural than the practice at another site, where responding to a subject brought it forward again–but then their thread on eternal life was becoming an argument against eternal life by its own quite unreadable length.